1708|JUSTICE BEFORE SPANISH PUBLIC OPINION (I)

Open data API in a single place

Provided by Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas

Get early access to 1708|JUSTICE BEFORE SPANISH PUBLIC OPINION (I) API!

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

Dataset information

Country of origin
Updated
Created
Available languages
Spanish
Keywords
Administración y servicios públicos, JUSTICIA, Delincuencia y seguridad ciudadana, Estudio Cuantitativo
Quality scoring
140

Dataset description

— Opinion I would give to a foreign friend about the degree of compliance with the laws by the Spaniards. — Knowledge of the institution that prepares the laws in Spain. — Evaluation of the criminalisation in Spain of crime. — Responsibility of the various social agents in the punishment of criminals. — Equality of laws. — Social groups favored by laws. — Assessment of the appropriate punishments for each type of crime. — Opinion on whether the penalties established for crimes in our Penal Code are rather soft or rather harsh. — Degree of agreement with phrases on law enforcement and crime. — Opinion on whom the criminal laws apply in Spain. — Opinion on equal treatment in the application of criminal laws in Spain. — Image you have of the current figure of the judge in Spain. — Image that most people have of the figure of the judge, currently, in our country. — Definition that you would most like to characterise the Spanish judge. — Degree of trust in the judge. — Agreement with the impartiality of Spanish judges in lawsuits. — Opinion on whether a woman is in better or worse condition than a man to be a judge. — Personal preference for being judged by a man or woman. — Degree of agreement with different phrases on the functioning of justice. — Degree of agreement with sentences on attitudes to justice. — Attitude that I would adopt in the event of having a conflict with another person. — Attitude that I would adopt if justice were faster. — Attitude that I would adopt if the lawsuits were cheaper. — Degree of independence of the Spanish courts of justice. — Evolution of judicial independence since socialists rule. — Assessment of the current functioning of the courts of justice in Spain. — Retrospective assessment of the functioning of the courts (4-5 years). — Prospective assessment of the functioning of the courts after the reform of the Administration of Justice. — Scale of assessment (1-10) of the functioning of different courts in Spain. — Opinion on the sufficiency of means in the Administration of Justice. — What are the insufficient resources in the administration of justice. — Assessment of the functioning of the Administration of Justice in Spain. — Assessment of the functioning of the administration of justice in Spain compared to 1982. — Prospective assessment of the functioning of the administration of justice in Spain (2 or 3 years). — Approval of the policy of the central government in relation to the administration of justice. — Opinion on whether the people who are in charge of the Ministry of Justice are prepared and know what they bring in their hands. — Opinion on the government’s administration of money dedicated to the administration of justice. — Opinion on the sufficiency of economic means that the State devotes to the Administration of Justice. — Attitude towards the introduction of the jury trial in Spain. — Personal preference for judge or jury, for sentencing, in the case of being charged in a criminal trial. — More democratic system to determine guilt or innocence, judges or jury. — Opinion on whether the jury would be fairer than judges, more or less equal or less fair than judges. — Opinion on the greatest benevolence of a jury in front of the judges. — Phrase with which you agree more about whether the judges or jurors are the most fair in their decisions. — Personal attitude towards being part of a jury in a trial. — Predisposition to be part of a jury. — Participation or testimony in a trial or lawsuit of the person interviewed. — Assessment of the current situation of Spanish prisons. — Opinion on benevolence in the treatment of prisoners. — Degree of agreement with different opinions about Spanish prisons. — Positioning against the death penalty. — Crimes before which he believes the application of the death penalty is appropriate. — Knowledge of conscientious objection. — Degree of agreement with different phrases on conscientious objection. — Degree of agreement with different phrases about conscientious objectors. — Opinion on the duration of civilian services alternative to military service (objection of conscience). — Most important services where conscientious objectors can perform their substitute activities (2). — Ideological self-location scale (1-10). — Household income level. — Frequency of attendance at religious offices. — Intention to vote in supposed general elections. — Political party for which you feel more sympathy in the general elections. — I remember voting in the 1986 general election.
Build on reliable and scalable technology
Revolgy LogoAmazon Web Services LogoGoogle Cloud Logo
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Some basic informations about API Store ®.

Operation and development of APIs are currently fully funded by company Apitalks and its usage is for free.
Yes, you can.
All important information such as time of last update, license and other information are in response of each API call.
In case of major update that would not be compatible with previous version of API, we keep for 30 days both versions so you will have enough time to transfer to new version. We will inform you about the changes in advance by e-mail.

Didn't find the API you need?

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

API Store provides access to European Open Data via scalable and reliable REST API interface.
Copyright © 2024. Made with ♥ by Apitalks