2015|JUSTICE BEFORE SPANISH PUBLIC OPINION (II)

— Assessment of the functioning of the Administration of Justice in Spain. — Retrospective assessment of the functioning of the courts (4-5 years). — Participation or testimony in a trial or lawsuit of the person interviewed, family or friends. — Predisposition to reach an agreement or go to court in a hypothetical conflict. — Maintaining the latter attitude in the event that justice were: faster and cheaper. — Evaluation of the criminalisation in Spain of crime. — Degree of responsibility of different institutions for insufficient punishment of offenders. — Opinion on whether the penalties established for crimes in our Penal Code are rather soft or rather harsh. — Opinion on equal treatment in the application of criminal laws in Spain. — Agreement with the impartiality of the Spanish judges in the lawsuits. — Degree of trust in the judge. — Degree of acceptance of the introduction in Spain of the trial with jury. — Personal preference for judge or jury, for sentencing, in the case of being charged in a criminal trial. — Reason of personal preference by jury to deliver sentence in the case of being charged in a criminal trial. — More democratic system to determine guilt or innocence, judges or jury. — Phrase with which you agree more about whether the judges or jurors are the most fair in their decisions. — Degree of agreement with sentences about jury trials. — Personal attitude towards being part of a jury in a trial. — Reason why you would like to be part of a jury in a trial. — Reason why he would dislike being part of a jury in a trial. — Agreement with phrases about the Spanish judicial system. — Assessment of the current functioning of the courts of justice in Spain. — Reasons why you believe that the current functioning of the courts of justice in Spain is regular, bad or very bad. — Opinion on whether the fight against crime is also a matter for all citizens. — Opinion on whether the Spaniards cooperate sufficiently with the police. — Opinion on whether it is true that there is more citizen insecurity or that people exaggerate things. — Retrospective assessment of street insecurity. — Degree of agreement with opinion on whether the authorities care more about the rights of offenders than those of victims. — Feeling of adequate personal protection from criminals and criminals. — Degree of agreement with different phrases about criminals. — Degree of protection of women from sexual offences by laws, police and courts of law. — The extent to which the judgments of the courts in the case of sexual offences are correct and consistent. — Degree of agreement with different opinions about Spanish prisons. — Personal suffering of crime or attempted crime (last 12 months). — Type of crime or attempted crime you have suffered (last 12 months). — Ideological self-location scale (1-10). — Intention to vote in supposed general elections. — Political party for which you feel more sympathy in the general elections. — Vote recall in the 1989 general election. — Marital status of the person interviewed. — Religiosity of the person interviewed.