2286|INSTITUTIONS AND AUTONOMIES (I)

Open data API in a single place

Provided by Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas

Get early access to 2286|INSTITUTIONS AND AUTONOMIES (I) API!

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

Dataset information

Country of origin
Updated
Created
Available languages
Spanish
Keywords
Estudio Cuantitativo, COMUNIDADES AUTÓNOMAS, Situación social y política de las Comunidades Autónomas, Cultura política, Identidad territorial
Quality scoring
140

Dataset description

— Assessment of the political and economic situation in Spain. — Assessment of the current and three-year retrospective political and economic situation of your Community. — Degree of interest in national, regional and municipal policy. — Opinion on the extent to which the decisions of the central government, the autonomous government and its municipality affect the welfare of the interviewee and his family. — Opinion on the Government’s degree of responsibility for the well-being of citizens. — Alternative formulas of state organisation in Spain. — Personal preference for a greater degree of autonomy of your Community. — Degree of agreement with different phrases on the role of the autonomous communities. — Assessment of the consequences for Spain of the creation and development of the autonomous communities. — Evaluation of the functioning of the State’s organisation in autonomous communities. — Degree of satisfaction with the functioning of its autonomous community. — Opinion on the position that the autonomous government should take when there is no agreement with the central government. — Opinion on the type of relationship existing between the central government and that of its autonomous community. — Differences in prosperity and wealth between the different autonomous communities in Spain today. Evolution of these differences since the Autonomous Communities exist. — Opinion on whether the development of the State of Autonomies has influenced the economic differences between regions and nationalities. — Opinion on which autonomous communities have a lower standard of living and those with a higher standard of living. — Assessment of the policy carried out by the autonomous government on various issues of general interest. Evolution of these issues over the past three years. Principal responsible (central government, self-government or city council) for the evolution of these issues. — Degree of information on the activities carried out by the Autonomous Government, the Parliament of its Community and its City Council. — Evaluation of the management carried out in the last three years by the autonomous government and by the opposition. — Opinion on whether the autonomous government has demonstrated: honesty, efficiency, knowledge of regional problems, capacity for dialogue, communication with street people and defense of regional interests. — Approval of the current work of the Self-Government. — Opinion on the development of the Community in the event that it was the opposition that was at the head of the autonomous government. — Qualification of the work carried out by the City Council, the Autonomous Parliament, the Parliament of the Nation, the autonomous government and the central government. — Opinion on whether the functioning of the offices and public services managed by the Autonomous Government is better than that managed by the Central Administration and the City Council. — Opinion on which administration best treats citizens. — Evaluation of the management carried out in the last three years by the president of the autonomous community. — Degree of trust inspired by the president of his community. Approval of its action. — Degree of agreement with phrases concerning the voting of regional/national parties. — Degree of closeness to political parties. — Preference in the use of the terms region/nation to refer to the autonomous community itself. — Scale of regionalist sentiment and scale of nationalist sentiment. — Nationalist sentiment. — Membership, current or in the past, to different political and socio-cultural organisations. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Scale of ideology applied to political parties. — Vote recall in the general elections of March 1996 and in the last regional elections. — Vote fidelity in general elections in March 1996 and in the last regional elections. — Electoral volatility in general in March 1996 and in the last regional elections. — Autonomous community of birth of the interviewee and his parents. — Frequency of attendance at religious offices.
Build on reliable and scalable technology
Revolgy LogoAmazon Web Services LogoGoogle Cloud Logo
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Some basic informations about API Store ®.

Operation and development of APIs are currently fully funded by company Apitalks and its usage is for free.
Yes, you can.
All important information such as time of last update, license and other information are in response of each API call.
In case of major update that would not be compatible with previous version of API, we keep for 30 days both versions so you will have enough time to transfer to new version. We will inform you about the changes in advance by e-mail.

Didn't find the API you need?

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

API Store provides access to European Open Data via scalable and reliable REST API interface.
Copyright © 2024. Made with ♥ by Apitalks