2770|PUBLIC OPINION AND FISCAL POLICY (XXV)

— Nationality of the interviewee. — Frequently with which he talks about the operation of public services with co-workers, friends or family. — Opinion on the degree of demand of citizens with public services compared to 10 years ago. Degree of personal demand. — Degree of satisfaction with the operation of the various public services: education, health care in hospitals and outpatient facilities, post office, pension management, justice administration, social services, management of unemployment protection benefits, general government offices, railways, urban transport, public works. — Phrase that best expresses its opinion on taxes:they are a means of distributing wealth, it is an obligation imposed by the State is not well known in exchange for what or, are necessary for the State to provide public services, make roads, etc. — Consideration received by society in general and the interviewee and his family in particular for the payment of taxes and contributions to the State. — Assessment of the amount of resources the State devotes to: education, public works, unemployment protection, defence, citizen security, health, culture, housing, justice, pensions and social security, transport and communications and environmental protection. — According to the opinion that it is necessary to increase taxes to improve social services and benefits or with the opinion that it is possible to reduce taxes and maintain these services. — Assessment of the degree of responsibility of Spaniards when fulfilling their duties and obligations as citizens. Degree of personal responsibility. — Valuation of the amount of taxes that Spaniards pay, and comparison with other countries in Europe. — Justice in the distribution of tax payments. — Degree of tax fraud that currently exists in Spain, compared to that that existed five years ago. — Assessment of the efforts of the Administration in the fight against tax fraud. — Opinion and expectations about the number of people who defraud in the income tax return. Main cause that motivates the decrease in fraud in the declaration of income. — Opinion on the amount of fraud in the VAT return. — According to various phrases on the consequences of tax fraud. — Tax that would dislike more/less if it went up: Income tax or VAT. — Obligation to file the Income Declaration this year. Balance of this year’s income declaration. Ticked box for percentage allocation. — Opinion on the time it took this year to make the returns, compared to the previous year. — Person/entity who completed the declaration. Main reason why you went to a manager/advisor to complete the declaration. Means used for its presentation. — Inspection of the income declaration in the last five years, and probability that it will be done in the coming years. Result of the inspection. — Personal visit, in the last year, to some office of the Tax Agency. — Degree of satisfaction with the treatment received in the offices of the Tax Agency. Evaluation of the information and attention service to the taxpayer, current and compared with 5 years ago. — Opinion on which of the three administrations (central, regional or local) best manages the money collected by taxes. — Opinion on whether the state should spend less money than the tax collector so that the Autonomies could spend more. — Opinion on whether part of the money that the Autonomies spend should be spent by the City Councils. — Opinion on whether the State should act to avoid excessive indebtedness of Autonomies and Municipalities. — Scale of political ideology of the interviewee. — Vote recall in the March 2008 general election. — Religious practice.