3316|TRENDS IN THE DIGITAL SOCIETY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Open data API in a single place

Provided by Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas

Get early access to 3316|TRENDS IN THE DIGITAL SOCIETY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC API!

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

Dataset information

Country of origin
Updated
Created
Available languages
Spanish
Keywords
Estudio Cuantitativo, Coronavirus, Tecnologías de la comunicación y la información (TIC), Internet
Quality scoring
140

Dataset description

—Existence of Internet connection. —Reasons for which you do not have an Internet connection. —Existence of computer, laptop or tablet at home. —Number of computers or tablets in the home. —People using computers living at home —Internet coverage at home. —Procurement of increased Internet connection capacity since COVID-19 began —Acquisition of computer or computer equipment since COVID-19 began. —Acquisition of TV with better performance since COVID-19 began. —Usual Internet user before the COVID-19 pandemic. —Increased or reduced time spent as an Internet user since the pandemic. — Degree of agreement or disagreement with experience with digital devices. —Importance of the Internet and information technologies at the end of the pandemic. —Belief of increase/decrease in teleworking. — Purchases and management before the state of alarm and during the pandemic. —Work situation in times of pandemic. —Using the Internet to work online during the pandemic. — Realisation of teleworking activities at home. —The result of teleworking during the pandemic. —Reasons why the result of teleworking during the pandemic has been better, equal or worse. — Realisation of teleworking activities prior to the pandemic. —Technological equipment for the organisation of teleworking. —Use of the Internet for carrying out activities. —Assessment of teleworking for companies. —Reasons of the positive effect and harmful effect of teleworking on companies. —Assessment of telework for employees/workers —Reasons of the positive effect and harmful effect of teleworking on employees/workers. —Assessment of teleworking for society. —Reasons of the positive effect and harmful effect of teleworking for society. —Assessment of teleworking for family life. —Reasons of the positive effect and negative effect of teleworking on family life. —Studies studying at this time and modality of educational center in which he studies. —Implementation of online activities of the educational center before the pandemic. — Distance support procedure for educational maintenance during the pandemic. —Procedures or initiatives carried out by the educational center. —Quality of teaching in the experience lived during the last year with the pandemic. —Opinion regarding teachers who have interacted during the state of alarm and the pandemic. —Agreement/disagreement with face-to-face education. — Existence of children or young people of school age living together during the pandemic. —Parent with children or young people living together during the pandemic. —Number of children or young people in the home. —Ages of children or young people living at home. —Modality of educational center in which children or young people who live in the home study. — Realisation of online activities or computer initiation workshops before the pandemic. — Distance support procedures for students during the pandemic. —Mention of distance support procedures of the educational center during the pandemic. —Help for computer equipment or Internet connection for children or young people. —Organisms or entities from whom you have received assistance from computer equipment or Internet connection. —Type of help for computer equipment or Internet connection. —Opinion on the quality of teaching after experience during the pandemic. —Opinion about teachers who have interacted with students during the state of alarm and the pandemic. —More active participation in the education of children or young people by confinement. —Agreement/disagreement with people’s opinions on the return to face-to-face education. —Lack of technologies that the interviewee would have liked to have. —Electoral participation and vote memory in the November 2019 general elections of the voters. —Work situation of the person interviewed. —Occupation of the person interviewed and active and inactive population. —Schooling and level of studies achieved by the person interviewed. —Religiosity of the person interviewed and frequency of attendance at religious offices. —Social class and subjective class identification of the person interviewed.
Build on reliable and scalable technology
Revolgy LogoAmazon Web Services LogoGoogle Cloud Logo
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Some basic informations about API Store ®.

Operation and development of APIs are currently fully funded by company Apitalks and its usage is for free.
Yes, you can.
All important information such as time of last update, license and other information are in response of each API call.
In case of major update that would not be compatible with previous version of API, we keep for 30 days both versions so you will have enough time to transfer to new version. We will inform you about the changes in advance by e-mail.

Didn't find the API you need?

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

API Store provides access to European Open Data via scalable and reliable REST API interface.
Copyright © 2024. Made with ♥ by Apitalks