Pressures and threats for individual bird species: Tenth UK Report for Article 12 of the EU Birds Directive (2008-2012)

Open data API in a single place

Provided by Government Digital Service

Get early access to Pressures and threats for individual bird species: Tenth UK Report for Article 12 of the EU Birds Directive (2008-2012) API!

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

Dataset information

Country of origin
Updated
Created
Available languages
English
Keywords
Marine, Freshwater, European Reporting, Article 12, Terrestrial, Birds Directive
Quality scoring
130

Dataset description

This dataset records the principal factors responsible for causing individual bird species to decline, suppressing their numbers or restricting their ranges. In accordance with the EU guidelines, It has only been be completed for species triggering SPA classifications. These data were submitted by the UK to the EU as part of the Tenth UK Report for Article 12 of the EU Birds Directive (2008-2012). An EU standardised list of pressures and threats was used for this report. See http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Reporting/Article_12/reference_portal. The Identifier column is made up of a combination of season (B=breeding, P=passage and W=Wintering) and the standard EU bird codes (NOWAK codes). The relative importance of each of the pressures and threats has been ranked in one of three categories: * H = High importance/impact: Important direct or immediate influence, and/or acting over large areas. * M = Medium importance/impact: Medium direct or immediate influence, mainly indirect influence, and/or acting over moderate part of the area/ regionally only. * L = Low importance/impact: Low direct or immediate influence, indirect influence, and/or acting over small part of the area/ locally only. The reliability of the impact score given in the column "c) Quality of impact assessment": * 3 = Good – e.g. evidence exists from experimental studies showing that the factor has an influence on the species. * 2 = Moderate – e.g. correlational studies strongly indicate that the factor has an influence on the species, but its impact has not been tested. * 1 = Poor – e.g. expert opinion suggests that the factor could plausibly have an influence on the species, but without any evidence. The primary location of each reported impact is shown in the "location" field as follows : * 4 = Inside the Member State * 3 = Elsewhere in the EU * 2 = Outside EU * 1 = Both inside and outside EU * x = Unknown
Build on reliable and scalable technology
Revolgy LogoAmazon Web Services LogoGoogle Cloud Logo
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Some basic informations about API Store ®.

Operation and development of APIs are currently fully funded by company Apitalks and its usage is for free.
Yes, you can.
All important information such as time of last update, license and other information are in response of each API call.
In case of major update that would not be compatible with previous version of API, we keep for 30 days both versions so you will have enough time to transfer to new version. We will inform you about the changes in advance by e-mail.

Didn't find the API you need?

Let us know and we will figure it out for you.

API Store provides access to European Open Data via scalable and reliable REST API interface.
Copyright © 2024. Made with ♥ by Apitalks